Article XIV · Revision 1 · 2026-05-20 rights

Medical Autonomy and Ethical Protections

Full Text

Summary

Background

Revisions

Discussion

Right to Informed Consent

Every Albertan has the right to decide what medical treatments they do or do not receive. No procedure may be performed without their voluntary, informed consent, except in genuine emergencies when they are unconscious and no one can consent on their behalf.

Freedom from Coercion or Discrimination

No one may be punished or denied employment, education, public services, or travel simply for refusing a medical treatment or vaccine. A narrow exception applies only when a court confirms that refusal creates a clear and immediate risk to others.

Medical Conscience and Professional Integrity

Health-care practitioners and institutions may decline to perform procedures that conflict with their ethical or religious beliefs, so long as patients are not neglected or endangered. No professional may be disciplined simply for such a refusal.

Parental and Guardian Medical Rights

Parents and guardians have the right to accept or refuse medical treatments for their minor children. A government or institution may override that decision only if a court finds, on clear and convincing evidence, that the child faces imminent risk of serious harm.

Protection from Government Overreach

Even during a declared public-health emergency, any measure that limits a person's medical autonomy must be formally authorized, time-limited, reviewed by the legislature, and proportionate to a real and demonstrable threat.

Right to informed consent for medical treatment
Prohibition on coercion or discrimination based on refusal of medical treatment
Conscience protection for health-care practitioners
Parental authority over health-care decisions for minor children
Limits on public-health emergency overrides

Why this article is proposed

Informed consent and bodily autonomy are foundational principles in Canadian medical practice, but they have largely been protected through common law and professional standards rather than entrenched constitutional text. Recent public-health measures have sharpened public interest in formalizing these protections. The article would entrench them in a provincial constitution.

What it would change

Section 1 entrenches informed consent. Section 2 prohibits coercion or discrimination based on refusal of medical treatment, with a narrow public-health exception. Section 3 entrenches conscience protection for health-care practitioners. Section 4 confirms parental authority over minor children's health care, with a court-order exception. Section 5 conditions any emergency override on time limits, legislative review, and proportionality.

The legal basis

Health care delivery is provincial under Constitution Act, 1867 s.92(7) (provincial hospitals) and s.92(16) (matters of a local or private nature). Health professions are regulated provincially. Constitution Act, 1982 s.45 lets Alberta entrench provincial law on these subjects. The article cannot bind federally regulated workplaces, federal border measures, or the federal exercise of the criminal-law power (which includes the regulation of certain drugs and procedures).

Open questions

Three questions for Albertans: how to define "clear and imminent harm to others" in Section 2 so that it sets a workable threshold for legitimate public-health measures without being so broad that the right to refuse becomes nominal; how to align Section 4 with the mature minor doctrine recognized in A.C. v. Manitoba; and whether Section 3's conscience protection should include a duty of effective referral, as the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta currently requires.

Revision 1 2026-05-20

major

Initial draft of Article XIV from the v2 draft constitution, with per-section classification, current-law context, and editorial notes.

Loading comments...